In classical Greek, the tensions in the ancillary clauses must correspond to those of the upper clauses that govern them.  (Unlike Latin and Romance languages, however, the subjunctive mind has no time and will obviously not follow the times.) Time-based words and phrases as before, after, after time and others — when used to bind two or more actions in time — can be good indicators of the need for a perfectly-stretched verb in a sentence. In this example as in the first two, the progressive verbs will have listened and will stand to display the current actions. The perfect progressive verb to come will have listened, proposes proposals for action that will begin in the time frame before the main narrative framework and that will still be in progress when another action begins. The verb is here in its present form, but the rest of the sentence and the full context of the narration tell us to understand that it refers to the future time. The remaining strained relationships are comparable to those of the first two examples. This writer uses contemporary form to describe the appearance of a dragonfly on a specific July morning. However, past and future times are necessary when they refer to past actions and their foreseeable activity in the future. As the Greek times express the aspect of the verb more than time, we do not have the “Consecutio Temporum” but the “Consecutio Modorum”, the sequence of moods. If you feel troubled by this sentence, you are right. The first verb is in the current form, and the second is in the past, but the change between times is generally not allowed.
We can improve the sentence by writing that the verb chord in this sentence makes sense, because the cake must be made before it can be eaten. I eat the cake is a clause for itself; the word that signals a new clause, entirely with a subject (I) and a verb (made). If you are very attentive to the tense verb chord, you will find that your writing can be easily understood by your readers. The main tension in this first sample is passed. Tense movements are inappropriate and are indicated in bold. Love is currently tense and refers to a current state (they still love it now;) Built is past, refers to an action completed before the current period (they do not build it yet).) In general, the use of perfect times is determined by their relationship to the tension of the primary narrative. If the main narrative is in the past simple, then the action that is initiated before the period of primary narration is perfectly described in the past. If the main narrative is in a simple present, then the action that is initiated before the period of primary narration is perfectly described in the present. If the main narrative is in a simple future, then the action that will be launched before the primary narrative period in the future will be perfectly described. If the verb of the main sentence is tense in the past, the verbal forms of the subordinate are adapted to those of the main sentence: to a main tension (current, tense or full tension) in the upper clause follows a main tension in the indicative mood or conjunctiva mood.
Such a main tension is followed by: with quotation marks to indicate that this part of the sentence represents the actual words of the Minister. However, this requires the use of the natural sequence of tensions which, in the current situation, may not seem appropriate. There are several possible solutions to this problem: The debate between grammars on the adequacy of the two types of time dates back to the 18th century.  The use of the sequence is sometimes a source of additional problems when the grammatical construction of the indirect language contains an integrated quotation, that is, when one tries (if one uses indirect language instead of direct language) to signal the words actually spoken.